The US Senate Advances the Respect for Marriage Act

In the event the Extreme Court overturns landmark rulings in cases like Obergefell, which found same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry, or Lawrence v. Texas, which found a constitutional right to sexual intimacy, or Loving v. Virginia, which granted interracial couples the right to marry, the US Senate just advanced the Respect for Marriage Act in a 62-37 vote. It easily cleared the 60-vote procedural hurdle needed to move the legislation forward. Drafters of the plan were optimistic it would garner enough backing from the GOP after a bipartisan group of senators made changes to the bill to protect religious liberty.

Here are the Republicans who did the right thing and voted with the Democratic Party to protect our rights:

  • Roy Blunt of Missouri
  • Richard Burr of North Carolina
  • Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia
  • Susan Collins of Maine
  • Joni Ernst of Iowa
  • Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming 
  • Lisa Murkowski of Alaska 
  • Rob Portman of Ohio 
  • Mitt Romney of Utah
  • Dan Sullivan of Alaska
  • Thom Tillis of North Carolina  
  • Todd Young of Indiana

“Today, the Senate is taking a truly bold step forward in the march toward greater justice, greater equality, by advancing the Respect for Marriage Act,” Schumer said in a speech from the Senate floor before the vote. “It’s a simple, narrowly tailored but exceedingly important piece of legislation that will do so much good for so many Americans. It will make our country a better, fairer place to live.”

Once signed into law, the bill will repeal the “Clinton-era Defense of Marriage Act and safeguards same-sex and interracial marriage by requiring the recognition of valid marriages regardless of ‘sex, race, ethnicity or national origin.'”

In order to garner Republican support, the drafters ensured “nonprofit religious organizations will not be required to provide services, facilities or goods for the celebration of a same-sex marriage, and protects religious liberty and conscience protections available under the Constitution and federal law, including the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. It also makes clear the bill does not authorize the federal government to recognize polygamous marriage and safeguards any benefit or status — such as tax-exemptions, grants, contracts or educational funding — of an entity so long as it does not arise from a marriage.”

The House will have to vote on the amended version of the original legislation. Then off to President Biden for his signature. The White House has urged passage of the bill.

Avatar photo
About Ms. G 5559 Articles
WTF, America?! What the actual F?!