Two extreme justices, who should not have never been confirmed in the first place, may retire soon. Who are those two justices, you might ask? Justice Uncle Clarence (76) and Justice Uncle Sam (74), the two most, extreme and corrupt justices on the bench.
In The Felon Guy’s last term, he appointed three, Federal Society approved justices to the bench which resulted in the most conservative Supreme Court in a century. Now, GQPers are very excited about the prospect of building on those efforts by confirming even more conservative justices, as well as lower-court judges, if TFG wins another four years. If the Felon Guy defeats VP Harris, confirming his fascist, justice needs only 51 US Senators to confirm them. That is one major reason the Democratic Party must retain control of the US Senate; otherwise, we’re looking at numerous fascists appointed to all federal courts.
GQPers are already chomping at the bit and and betting on the Democratic Party losing the Senate and The Felon Guy returning to the White House. Both, of which, would prove catastrophic for our country, as a whole.
“High — extremely high to certain,” Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., who is on the Judiciary Committee, said when he was asked about the odds of Trump’s having the opportunity to appoint more Supreme Court justices if Republicans emerge victorious in the election.
“I think you’ll see, on the conservative side, at least one retirement. I’m speculating, but I’m fairly confident of that,” Hawley said, adding that Republicans would probably look for more potential justices in the mold of Thomas and Alito — “particularly if we’re replacing one of those individuals.”
If Trump were to get two more Supreme Court picks, he will have appointed over half the court, which no president has done since Franklin D. Roosevelt and the subsequent creation of the presidential two-term limit.
For Democrats, that’s a scary possibility — and one they hope will motivate their voters to turn out this fall and prevent a Trump win.
“It would not be good,” Sen. Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, deadpanned.
“We would have even more getting rid of precedents. You’d have more Dobbs-like decisions. And there’s a whole slew of these kinds of decisions that the Supreme Court has been engaged in,” said Hirono, who is on the Judiciary Committee. “It’ll just be worse. So I think what that will lead to is further calls, I hope, for Supreme Court reform.”
